A case against the Green Climate Fund’s concurrent 50:50 ratio climate change mitigation and adaptation strategy

Journal article

M. I. Espinoza, S. R. Brechin
Climatic Change, vol. 142(311–320), 2017

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-017-1938-8

Cite

APA Click to copy
Espinoza, M. I., & Brechin, S. R. (2017). A case against the Green Climate Fund’s concurrent 50:50 ratio climate change mitigation and adaptation strategy. Climatic Change, 142(311–320). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1938-8

Chicago/Turabian Click to copy
Espinoza, M. I., and S. R. Brechin. “A Case against the Green Climate Fund’s Concurrent 50:50 Ratio Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Strategy.” Climatic Change 142, no. 311–320 (2017).

MLA Click to copy
Espinoza, M. I., and S. R. Brechin. “A Case against the Green Climate Fund’s Concurrent 50:50 Ratio Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Strategy.” Climatic Change, vol. 142, no. 311–320, 2017, doi:10.1007/s10584-017-1938-8.

BibTeX Click to copy

@article{espinoza2017a,
  title = {A case against the Green Climate Fund’s concurrent 50:50 ratio climate change mitigation and adaptation strategy},
  year = {2017},
  issue = {311–320},
  journal = {Climatic Change},
  volume = {142},
  doi = {10.1007/s10584-017-1938-8},
  author = {Espinoza, M. I. and Brechin, S. R.}
}